RJI links 1.20.12

By Brian Steffens on January 20, 2012 0 Comments Ideas
Esther Thorson
Esther Thorson

In his weekly post Ken Doctor (immediately below) makes a compelling case that news companies need to provide signature name-brand content to differentiate themselves from the multitude of information providers out there. It's not a new argument, but it's one of the better presentations of it. News organizations need to provide unique, original content that they can't get elsewhere ... or in a way or format that adds value that they won't get elsewhere ... or both. The recent drumbeat has been for local, local, local, but has also included themes of investigative, watchdog, accountability, trustworthy journalism. This obviously requires journalists. "Name-brand content is worth investing in — even if it means cutting back elsewhere," Doctor says. RJI's Esther Thorson last year presented research and analysis that puts muscle behind Doctor's viewpoint, showing how dollars invested in (or denied) the newsroom impacts the bottom line. Her work is worth revisiting.

About a decade ago, while working with industry think-tank New Directions for News here at Mizzou, we worked with multidisciplinary teams from several of the industry's leading digital divisions: Belo Interactive, Freedom Interactive, Morris, McClatchy, Cox and others. Most of the companies set up separate digital divisions thinking that they needed their own leadership, skill sets, and laser focus (shed the distractions of the legacy platforms) in order to grow. Splitting off from the mother ship (usually the dominant metro newspaper in the company) gave them an agility and freedom to innovate. And for the most part, those divisions were successful. Yet once successful, most of those divisions were merged back into the mother ship -- usually under cover of "integrated local branding," not to mention some cost savings achieved by merging business and marketing functions and promoting a single brand.

How'd that work out? Some would say it squelched innovation, and slowed the growth of digital development. The industry has recently participated in a similar discussion around digital sales: separate digital and print sales teams, or one integrated sales team? We can find experts and consultants on the speaking circuit on both sides of the argument. In the second item below, Gordon Borrell offers his latest findings.

Original, signature content will replace all-access as 2012's hot topic

Digital-only sales staff perform better

How to profit from social media audience development

Game dynamics: Education, learning, not just for shoot em ups

Apple iBooks Author tool: Four opportunities for new organizations

Research: Tablet ads are outperforming print 

UK's Times will let subscribers "gift" pay model articles; may add micropayments

Key to digital revenue: Simplify it for local advertisers

Borrell case study: How Pittsburgh media divide up the online market

48 million in 2012: iPad3 expected to differentiate from competition

December Nielsen: Single brand Apple iPhone just 2 points shy of multiple brand Androids

Mobile: Context is the differentiator

CJR: Counterpoint to Clay Shirkey's dismissal of digital pay models

... and yet another view of whether/when content has value

Transforming the legacy print business: One company's journey

10 elements of a perfectly optimized web page

Finding success in a social world

Social media ROI still a work in progress

Agency adopts pay-for-performance model: Are we ready?

Newspapers: Boomers are the "appealing" audience but don't forget the others

Ad revenue: 400 publishers tell KubasPrimedia what they expect in 2012

Five forces for change in 2012

LA Times: Another view of John Paton's digital first strategy

No votes yet


Add Your Comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

You don't have to log in to leave a comment, but please leave your name.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.