What "engagement" means to Lauren McCullough at the Associated Press

By Joy Mayer on November 17, 2010 7 Comments Ideas

joy_0_0.jpgJoy Mayer, 2010-2011 Fellow

How do you build a relationship with a global audience, personalizing a brand and involving users in your coverage? The Associated Press is going for it, with aggressive social media strategies and a reliance on its 3,000 journalists.

"Fundamentally, we think people want to interact with people," says Lauren McCullough, the AP's manager of social networks and news engagement. Lauren and her team try to personalize the AP's corporate accounts, revealing who's behind them and using initials in the tweets, but "at the end of the day, we're three people in New York." That's why a cornerstone of the company's social media strategy is training the individual journalists on the benefits and practices of social media and hoping they feel comfortable enough to embrace it and run with it.

The folks at New York's Nerve Center (the global headquarters) will help out with local/regional coverage for breaking news. But in general, a reporter covering agriculture in the Midwest is encouraged to be an authentic person (while maintaining objectivity) and to engage with his or her local communities using social media, both on behalf of the company and individually. That reporter, then, should know how to make Twitter lists, how to interact on Facebook without sharing pictures of their kids and why both platforms can be valuable reporting tools.

The fundamental shift at the heart of these and other changes at the AP is a strategy involving more business-to-consumer approaches, not just products designed for other media outlets. They're trying to introduce people to the AP brand, Lauren says, and personalizing that brand is the mission of the flagship social media accounts.

Part of understanding social media for the AP is playing to the strengths of different platforms. The company has far fewer fans on Facebook (31,199 as of this morning) than followers on just its main news Twitter account (167,392). But while the numbers are lower, the Facebook page boasts a quality of conversation and developing community that they're not seeing on Twitter. The user investment level on that more personal platform is different. (A quick look at a few days' worth of posts on both accounts shows that, as you might expect, users are sharing more personal experiences and asking questions of the AP on Facebook. The Twitter account has been used mostly to share links to stories, with a few replies to specific users inviting them to get in touch with a staff member.)

Judging by more than just numbers is a challenge for the AP, as it is for most news folks these days. The staff is trying to figure out how to best take advantage of social media metrics that move beyond numbers into real understanding of influence and quality of the interaction. Lauren says they're looking into options and are nearing a decision on a service to use. For now, she manually tracks growth in followers, uses a bit.ly enterprise account and spends time with google analytics. It's not a scientific analysis, but it gives her a sense of impact and reach.

Social media is definitely at the heart of what "engagement" means to the Associated Press. The investment so far includes 11 Twitter accounts managed by the editorial department (a couple of them are @ap_fashion with 105,134 followers and @ap_Top25 with 12,566), and Facebook and YouTube presences. Most of the official accounts are handled in New York, but when asked specifically about some engagement strategies, Lauren returned to the power of the army of 3,000 reporters. If the AP is going to interact with users around specific content, it's likely to happen on the part of individual journalists. I asked if there's been an effort to get content out to specific users who might be interested in it. She said it's something editorial has talked about with the marketing department, and they're still together figuring out if that would cross any lines or how it might best be done.

Part of the job of Lauren's team is to pay attention to what's being talked about online, and report back to the rest of the nerve center. On the morning we had our talk, Prince William and royal wedding were trending topics. Information like that gets taken to the morning news meaning, along with news about how stories are getting played elsewhere and new products or innovations to keep an eye on. In addition to their news judgment (which Lauren says is still the most reliable and trusted tool) those factors are taken into account. The goal is to respond to the coverage people want.

"A big tenet of AP's social media strategy is that we have to be humble," Lauren says. "We can’t live in this model where we as an editor say, “Here are the top five stories you need to know about. We don’t care if you want them or think you need them."

"We’re trying really hard to break down those walls and to be approachable."

UPDATE NOV. 18: As I start to interview some large news organizations, it'll be so interesting to see how differently they approach their engagement efforts. Check out this interview with the Chicago Tribune. And let me know what engagement means to your newsroom.

Joy Mayer is a 2010-2011 RJI fellow working on a project called “Ditch the lecture. Join the conversation.” Read Joy's other blog posts here, and talk back at mayerj@missouri.edu and @mayerjoy on Twitter.

Comments

This is THE topic being

This is THE topic being discussed in newsrooms around the country. And I have to ask....what is wrong with sharing family photos or friends in social situations. Are we not as journalists real people? And is it not at the very basis of social media the idea that the profile reflects the genuine person? I can see where ethics still fit into the picture, no Obama or Palin comments from me online, or details on who I voted for but must I sanitize my Facebook page until I am no longer reflected? If so, then why on earth would a reader want to interact with me, to converse with me or join in on a discussion?

Hi Tricia, Joy's

Hi Tricia,

Joy's clarification on my example is correct. And I completely agree with your sentiment: We absolutely want our journalists to be real people. That's why we encourage AP journalists to have one Twitter account, one Facebook account, etc., where they can be both personal and professional.

If we use my Twitter account as an example: Some people may follow me because I tweet about social media. Others may follow me because they, too, are captivated by celebrity gossip. And others may also commute on the LIRR and enjoy commiserating about the service. By being real and authentic, I'm giving people lots of entry points to connect with me. As a journalist, I want to have a wide network of people I can listen to and bounce ideas off of. That's the beauty of the personal/professional approach to social media.

Thanks for reading the post!

Hi, Tricia! I don't think

Hi, Tricia!

I don't think Lauren intended to say that reporters weren't allowed to include pictures of their kids. She was talking about how to help reporters get over their hesitations about sharing personal information.

I'm a naturally open person, and I really don't mind the idea of most people I come into contact with seeing pictures of the Mayer family, including Thing One and Thing Two! But if reporters aren't comfortable with that, they can adjust their settings to have more professional-only relationships.

You're right — people are talking about this all over the place. And engagement means different things to different newsrooms. Check back (probably tomorrow) for the Chicago Tribune's version. It's about as different from AP's as it could be!

Joy, Hearst just rolled out

Joy,
Hearst just rolled out its "Social Media Policy" about a week ago. It's the buzz in my newsroom. I know after the detailed "instructions" on appropriate use were rolled out I debated started a profressional page, but then my real friends don't benefit from my profressional endeavors and my newsroom doesn't benefit by my only reaching "profressional" friends. Plus, two pages is too much work!

As an early adopter of social, an open person, and also chairwoman of San Antonio's Media Justice League., it's a discussion I know we need to be having and should have had a long time ago. MJL is getting ready to read Jennifer Pozner's "Share This" and I think it is going to be very informative. If you've read it, we should talk, if not, pick up a copy ...we can talk later. I really think newsrooms need help adapting to an age where your realness goes a long way.

Thanks so much for the book

Thanks so much for the book recommendation, Tricia. I'll get a copy. Is this it?

That is it, Joy! I love

That is it, Joy! I love reading all the things you are learning and exploring. Thank you for sharing. Engagement is such an interesting topic ....I think television journalists figured it our years ago.

Also, sorry, that book IS by

Also, sorry, that book IS by Deanna Zandt, not Jen Pozner. Oops!

Add Your Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.