Conflict of Interest? A Guest Commentary, A Letter to the Editor, and Corrections Standards
Shopping cart
View your shopping cart.
Related Items
- Conflicts of Interest Checklist
- We Have Met the Copy Editor, and He Is Now Us, the Reporters
- Do Letters to the Editor Reflect 'Regular' Opinion?
- How to Write a Letter to the Editor
- Regret The Error' Posts Top Corrections Of The Year
- Conflict and Conflation of Race and Gender
- How do you get readers interested in a story?
Upcoming Events
-
The Journalytics Summit
September 26, 2013
RJI In the News
-
The Future is Now The Reynolds Journalism Institute is shaping how journalists deliver news.
June 18, 2013 -
Top Research Explores Social Media Effectiveness, Creativity
June 18, 2013 -
Guest Column: Journalism 3.0 - News ecosystem fast evolving
June 18, 2013 -
Social-classifieds company adFreeq awarded $50,000 St. Louis Arch Grant
June 14, 2013 -
State and campus leaders meet with Vietnamese ambassador, urging increased trade, student presence
June 14, 2013
by CCJ Staff, An exchange between CCJ Executive Director Jeffrey Dvorkin and a concerned citizen
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 4:13 PM
To: ccj@concernedjournalists.org
Subject: Question on Journalism Standards
As a reader, I am writing to ask your professional opinion regarding journalism standards. If a newspaper reader brings to the editor’s attention multiple factual inaccuracies in a published Guest Commentary, is it ethical and/or standard practice for the editor to contact the mayor of the city, which was the topic of the commentary, and publish the mayor’s (reader’s) corrections as a letter to the editor? The guest commentary appeared on a Sunday, the reader emailed corrections on Sunday, the editor never acknowledged the readers email, never published corrections in the newspaper and then on Thursday, published a letter to the editor by the mayor including some, but not all, of the readers corrections, almost verbatim, signed by the mayor.Thank you for your response.
Ms. Paterson
Addendum: Ms. Paterson added in another message that her specific concerns are:
CCJ Executive Director Jeffrey Dvorkin's response:
Ms. Patterson is correct. I think the reader's observations and suggestions should have been noted by the newspaper as a reason for the mayor's response. Otherwise, the newspaper is simply playing the role of stenographer.
Jeffrey Dvorkin
Executive Director, CCJ
Do you have a question about how the media operates? A concern about a specific issue or event related to media coverage that you'd like our staff or our network of trainers, members, and associates to address? Send us an email at ccj@concernedjournalists.org.