Mike Fancher Bio
A 2008 – 2009 Donald W. Reynolds Fellow, Mike Fancher retired from The Seattle Times last year after 20 years as executive editor. During his tenure The Times won four Pulitzer Prizes and was a Pulitzer finalist 13 other times.
A story about his retirement quoted a Seattle official as saying, “Under Mike, the paper was fearless about tackling subjects it thought were important to the community. There were a lot of people in the community who didn’t like that. But, at the same time, the paper was gutsy, and fearless in admitting when it made a mistake.”
A competing editor said, “As a competitor, no one was tougher than Fancher. He’s incredibly creative on both the strategic, visionary level and at the tactical street fights that are part of winning and losing readers. The Seattle Times under Fancher was ahead of most newspapers in figuring out how to thrive in an increasingly complex media environment. The cornerstones were a comprehensive local news report, an emphasis on public-service investigative reporting, and assembling a stable of columnists and critics with singular, strong voices.”
Fancher is devoting his Fellowship year to the question, “What is the Journalist’s Creed for the 21st Century?” His research explores how shifting elements, such as the relationship between journalists and the public, affect the values and principles of journalists today and in the future. In addition Fancher serves as an adviser to the Knight Commission and is a frequent speaker at industry, civic and academic gatherings.
Thoughts on renewing the Journalist's Creed for the 21st Century
Jan. 2009
You need Adobe Flash Player 8 and javascript to view this video.
In January 2009 Mike Fancher met with students, grad students and faculty at the Reynolds Journalism Institute to discuss words that inspired Fancher’s own career — the Journalist's Creed. Written almost 100 years ago by Walter Williams, founder of the Missouri School of Journalism, the world’s first school dedicated to journalism, Williams penned his one-page testimonial to give dignity to the profession and articulate a personal standard of excellence. Mike Fancher met with the Missouri Journalism School chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists to discuss whether the challenges facing journalists have changed. Can today’s journalists make a statement like the one Walter Williams made? What can be done to insure that public-service journalism remains viable, relevant and accountable?
By Mike Fancher
The journalists of the future must have a new skill set that enables them to tell compelling stories in many ways, but they also must have a new mindset.
You must be both pragmatic and idealistic.
You must be skeptical and optimistic.
You can’t just be passionate about telling a story, you must care deeply that the story connects with people and matters to them.
You must be more entrepreneurial in terms of creating value in the information marketplace, without compromising clarity, accuracy, fairness, truth and independence.
You must hone your curiosity and critical thinking in ways that stir those qualities in the public, while also being ever attentive to the public’s questions and criticisms.
Loyalty to the public shouldn’t be an abstraction, but should be an abiding desire to connect on a human level.
You must be independent of those you cover without being indifferent or hostile. Independence achieves its greatest impact when tempered with a sense of goodwill.
You must gain comfort with technology as an enabler of great journalism, rather than a threat to it.
You must strive for perfection, while being open to admitting and learning from mistakes.
Relevance, optimism, inter-personal connection, healthy self-promotion, organizational savvy, curiosity, creativity, problem solving and leadership are all traits that must be nurtured.
My abiding faith in the future of professional journalism is because of young people like you who want to carry on this great traditional of public service.
You know that “the supreme test of good journalism is the measure of its public service.”
I listen to you and I find it easy to say:
I still believe in the profession of journalism.