
Mitchell S. McKinney
2012-2013 Reynolds Fellow
University fellow
Reynolds Journalism Institute
Associate Professor of Communication
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri
Contact
Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Telephone: 573-882-9230
Account Details
Member ID: 651
Group Title: Content providers
Join Date: June 16, 2015
Activity
Last Visit: December 31, 1969
Last Activity: December 31, 1969
Total Entries: 0
Technical
Timezone: UM6
Downloads
You haven't downloaded anything yet!
About Mitchell S. McKinney
Mitchell S. McKinney, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Missouri where he teaches courses in political communication. McKinney has combined practical political experience with his training as a political communication scholar, having served as a staff member in the U.S. Senate and at the White House. He has served as a consultant to C-SPAN and also the U.S. Commission on Presidential Debates, advising the Commission on how debates might be structured in order to better educate voters. He also served as an adviser for the Korean government as officials planned their 2002 televised presidential debates. McKinney has provided expert political commentary for such national media as The New York Times, USA Today, CNN and NPR.
Mitchell S. McKinney, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Missouri. He was a 2012-2013 RJI Fellow.
Stories about Mitchell S. McKinney
Hurley Symposium 2013
Researchers: Political Twitter users tend to tweet almost exclusively among themselves
April 10, 2013President’s sharp comebacks dominate debate tweets
October 23, 2012Tweeters respond to VP candidates’ heated verbal sparring
October 12, 2012
Twitter analysis of TV news events
Create a dashboard that will harvest and process Twitter responses to televised news in real time, providing valuable information about public opinion. Focusing on the 2012 campaign season, results will allow the news commentator to have a sense of what issues were hot-buttons, the relative response of males and females to each candidate and geographic responses to candidates or topics.